BUS623.W3A1.06.2022

Description:


Total Possible Score: 8.00

Identifies at Least Two Court Cases Relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and accurately identifies at least two court cases relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters.

Proficient - Identifies at least two court cases relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.

Basic - Vaguely identifies at least two court cases relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify at least two court cases relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The two court cases relating to Abercrombie & Fitch and Hooters are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Discusses the Outcomes of Each Court Case, and Reflects on Each Company’s Strategic Workforce Planning

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses the outcomes of each court case, and comprehensively reflects on each company’s strategic workforce planning.

Proficient - Discusses the outcomes of each court case, and reflects on each company’s strategic workforce planning. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially discusses the outcomes of each court case, and minimally reflects on each company’s strategic workforce planning. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss the outcomes of each court case and reflect on each company’s strategic workforce planning; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The discussion of the outcomes of each court case and reflection on each company’s strategic workforce planning are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Identifies a Company Where the Strategic Workforce Planning Process Strengthened the Company, Supporting with Facts and Rationale

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Clearly and accurately identifies a company where the strategic workforce planning process strengthened the company, fully supporting with facts and rationale.

Proficient - Identifies a company where the strategic workforce planning process strengthened the company, supporting with facts and rationale. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic - Vaguely identifies a company where the strategic workforce planning process strengthened the company, somewhat supporting with facts and rationale. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify a company where the strategic workforce planning process strengthened the company; however, does not support with facts and rationale, and/or significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The identification of a company where the strategic workforce planning process strengthened the company, supporting with facts and rationale is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.