BUS625.W4A1.05.2019

Description:


Total Possible Score: 8.00

Discusses the Industry Standards for Data Mining Best Practices

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses the industry standards for data mining best practices.

Proficient - Discusses the industry standards for data mining best practices. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally discusses the industry standards for data mining best practices. Relevant details are missing. 

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss the industry standards for data mining best practices; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The discussion of the industry standards for data mining best practices is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Identifies Pitfalls in Data Mining, Including Practices That Should Be Avoided

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and accurately identifies pitfalls in data mining, including practices that should be avoided.

Proficient - Identifies pitfalls in data mining, including practices that should be avoided. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.

Basic - Vaguely identifies pitfalls in data mining, including practices that should be avoided. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify pitfalls in data mining, including practices that should be avoided; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The identification of pitfalls in data mining, including practices that should be avoided is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Provides an Example of a Company That Has Successfully Practiced Data Mining and Discusses How and Why They Were Successful

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Provides a detailed, appropriate example of a company that has successfully practiced data mining, and thoroughly discusses how and why they were successful.

Proficient - Provides an appropriate example of a company that has successfully practiced data mining, and discusses how and why they were successful. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Provides a limited example of a company that has successfully practiced data mining, and minimally discusses how and why they were successful. Relevant details are missing and/or inappropriate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an example of a company that has successfully practiced data mining and discuss how and why they were successful; however, significant details are missing and inappropriate.

Non-Performance - The example of a company that has successfully practiced data mining and discussion of how and why they were successful are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the instructions.


Provides an Example of Company That Experienced a Failed Data Mining Experience, and Identifies the Pitfalls in Their Data Mining Practice and What Could Have Been Done Differently

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Provides a detailed, appropriate example of a company that experienced a failed data mining experience, and clearly and accurately identifies the pitfalls in their data mining practice and what could have been done differently.

Proficient - Provides an example of company that experienced a failed data mining experience, and identifies the pitfalls in their data mining practice and what could have been done differently. Minor details are missing, slightly inappropriate, unclear, or inaccurate.

Basic - Provides a limited example of company that experienced a failed data mining experience, vaguely identifies the pitfalls in their data mining practice and what could have been done differently.  Relevant details are missing, inappropriate, unclear, and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an example of company that experienced a failed data mining experience and identify the pitfalls in their data mining practice and what could have been done differently; however, significant details are missing, inappropriate, unclear, and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The example of a company that experienced a failed data mining experience and identification of the pitfalls in their data mining practice and what could have been done differently are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.75

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.75

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.